
I know I am days late with this post, and that there are probably already into the millions of posts and forum discussions about the iPad on the web right now but I thought I would throw in my two-cents worth as well.
There was a lot of hype in the build up to the launch this week, as there always is with Apple, but there were some differences that made some people talk... normally before a launch Apple remain tight lipped, saying nothing and ocasionally unofficially leaking information to the press to try and lower expectations (it was suspected that the "analysts" predicting the price of the iPad was going to be coming in at $1,000 was in fact due to an unofficial leak - so when Steve Jobs announce the entry level price was half that its a big win straight away). However, this time Apple were not so quiet about it, with it being mentioned a few times by some of the top dogs, most notably mr Jobs himself saying it was the best thing he had ever worked on.
So is the iPad going to be any good? in my humble oppinion, that depends, but it is looking like it will be a yes. For the iPad, or any new tablet device for that matter, to be successful it needs to offer something different, it needs to change the way we use things and do things - Recently Microsoft announced their tablet, which was quite hugely panned, because it was just a Windows machine in tablet form, which doesn't really offer much to anyone, as apart from the touchscreen functionality what does it really offer more than a NetBook? There is no real reason to use a tablet at home or in the office over a laptop/desktop so if all it really offers is a different way to surf the web or read things on the move then its just not that good.
Why does Apple have any chance of doing better than the Windows tablet? basically because of the emphasis on user interaction from the iPod/iPhone has paved the way for where tablet computing can really revolutionise computing.
A lot of people have been talking about using tablet devices to read newspapers and books, and it will change the way people read news, and this is true, but it needs to offer more than just the ability to read the content like you would from a website, the content needs to be interactive, for example, imagine a cookery book where you could read the recipe but also pull down videos of various stages, details about the ingredients and suggested alternatives, all without leaving the recipe page; or a history book where you could read about the second world war and pull down biographical information about various generals or see timelines and photos, again all without having to leave the page - without having to trawl through links on wikipedia.
That would be revolutionising the way we read, the way we learn and Apples UI naturally lends itself to an interface that facilitates this sort of interaction. However, unfortunately, all this content needs to be created, and thats not something Apple can do - its up to the content providers to "tablet-ify" their news, and publishers need to do the same for books and encyclopedias, and this is a big ask!
Thankfully for Apple, there are already a few startups appearing with the sole aim of helping publishers and content providers get the information in a iPad friendly format, so maybe in the not so distant future we will be seeing the change in the way we receive information...
so like i said... maybe.